Monday, 21 September 2009

Boating in Amsterdam

Despite numerous previous visits, I had never seen the tall, wonky buildings and bicycle-clad bridges of Amsterdam from the unique perspective of the canals, and with this playing on my mind, my compatriots and I made our way down to the docks to hire an aqueous steed for the afternoon.

We arrived at a small hut at the end of a rickety jetty. It was roughly twice the size of a portaloo and on approach one could only envisage a troll angrily emerging from inside, scuttling up the jetty to the creaking, swaying bridge between jetty and canal bank, and manically waving his arms around whilst roaring a torrent of indecipherable abuse in an attempt to defend his territory. This, however, was not to be the case, as on inspection the shack was sparsely decorated with sailing accoutrements but eerily bereft of human (or troll) life.

In the enforced lull we took time to inspect the boats for hire. Whilst robust and evidently seaworthy, these were not the plush, comfortable motorboats frequently observed making waves serenely through the city's famous waterways. In fact, the boats were no more than several different sized sheets of steel welded together. The concept of relaxed and comfortable seating was poorly represented by three strips of bare metal which braced the boat width ways. It was at this point in the assessment that a man approached our party.

Bounding carefree over other small boats tied to the dock came a small fellow of oriental descent, evidently the proprietor or a person working under the employ of such a figure. He seemed a genial man, eager to iron out the bureaucratic formalities that would characterise our final few moments on terra firma and with them smoothly out of the way, he instructed us on the methods of steering and propelling our craft. Furnishing us each with a small sheet of five millimeter thick foam to protect our posteriors from numbness, our cruise facilitator untethered us from the dock and, with trepidation, we began to navigate the most major of the canals that we would encounter during our journey, one that would take us to the network of smaller canals in the heart of Amsterdam.

Having traversed the aforementioned intimidating stretch of water, we breathed a collective sigh of relief as the canal banks closed around our boat and we became free to concentrate on the scenery about us. We made past other travelers relaxing on the bank with drinks and snacks, under arched bridges alive with the sound of cyclists' bells and through streets lined with homes that tilted and slanted in numerous directions. As we coasted past moored canalboats serving as dwellings, adorned with furnishings and decoration to make them warm and welcoming places to inhabit, the sun threw off its blanket of cloud and cast warm, gentle rays over the water, ripples sparkling and twinkling in appreciation.

The general novelty of our predicament began to wane after some time and we continued our slow but steady progress through the canals considering what direction best to point our vessel. Soon we were heading for a notorious thoroughfare of Amsterdam, one made famous by a multitude of harlots who repeatedly bequeath the fruits of their loins to gentleman willing and able to pay suitable recompense. It would be a delightful folly, thought the three of us, to witness the usual scenes of exhibition, bravado and barter from the comfort of our boat.

We eventually reached the top of the particular canal. The sunshine became more modest and the sky grayed somewhat, various shades of neon red still visible in the daylight. Flesh jiggled in windows, eyes attempted to ensnare, fake fingernails tapped on windows, folds of unkept skin obscured economical undergarments. Giggling, intrigued tourists walked in parallel with our boat on the canal banks, mixing all the time with groups of boisterous, leering men and shabbily dressed individuals quietly exiting doorways or surreptitiously making enquiries. Our steel tub continued to slice through the water, the occasional swan gently swimming out of our path, its gleaming white plumage in stark contrast to the dull, litter-strewn water beneath, and the seedy machinations of the street in whose midst it now swam.

Two thirds of our journey down this canal, we came across an unusually high volume of ducks. Perhaps, we conjectured, this was related to the amount of food-related litter deposited in the water on this stretch, thanks to its popularity with tourists and sexually repressed males, of which, surely, there are many. Thankfully these ducks were taking evasive action in order to avoid collisions with our vessel, much like the swans, including swimming from its path but also, on this occasion, flying away from the bow of our ship.

A piercing shriek from an associate suddenly drew my attention and almost before I'd turned around to regard my company I felt repeated and heavy thuds on my head, as if a torrential rain shower had begun. In that same instant, I adopted a cowering posture, similar to that of the brace position made famous by flight attendants, and could only wait in this defensive position until the deluge had subsided. When I straightened myself and turned to my shipmates with a look of both shock and dread on my face, the exact nature of our misfortune quickly became apparent. At first I thought we may have been pelted by jealous contemporaries from the shore but it was with alarm I realised that our craft and its party had been heavily defecated on by fleeing ducks. Our clothes were streaked with earth coloured stains, each of which had a nucleus of grit which was quite clearly feces. Numerous witnesses laughed uproariously, as well they might, while we smiled in resigned dismay, contemplating the fact that we were at our furthest point from the harbour, with at least an hour's journey back through Amsterdam's waterways covered in shite.

With heavy hearts we set out on the long, ardous path back to the dock. The overcast skies and falling temperatures seemed to mimic the sombre atmosphere aboard our craft. At every turn the waterways seem to stretch endlessly toward the horizon, a prospect which reminded me of tales of adventure involving Columbus, Vasco Da Gama and Ferdinand Magellan.

Through careful retracing of our steps, we eventually made it back to the first, wide expanse of water where our voyage had begun. As the small rental shack came into vision, our boat began to slow from its usual, deliberate walking pace to a state of total inertia. We were all immediately concerned; I wondered if perhaps a used prophylactic had become entwined on our propellor but after closer inspection the offending article happened to be a plastic bag. With no propulsion or steering, our craft gradually began to turn 180 degrees and bob gently back the way we had come, like flotsam and jetsam being washed out to the ocean. My associates, by now, were frantically attempting to remove the detritus that was preventing us from continuing and were doing so with scant regard to the weight distribution in the boat. The danger of us capsizing was tangible, and as a man who was cold, in need of refreshment, drifting in the direction opposite to the one in which I wished to go, and covered in shite, I did the only thing I could and collapsed in the boat, in tears of delirious hysterics.

When we finally arrived back at our mooring we paid our good friend his frankly exorbitant fee for the use of his boat. Being the conscientious man he so clearly was, he politely asked us if we had enjoyed ourselves and, lest he should notice the shite that was so abundant about our personage and so deep within the hairs on my head, we sheepishly said yes and quickly made off to our residence.

Friday, 29 May 2009

Bulletproof

La Roux have been rattling the loose fixtures in my flat with their Skream remixed version of In For The Kill for the last couple of months.

Please find attached the video for their new single Bulletproof. Watch for it raining shapes in the Tron influenced video at 2:35.

Back with some writing in the next few days.

Friday, 1 May 2009

It was acceptable in the 80s (and now)


Ah, fashion; crazy isn't it? There I was, as a 15 year old, hating anything and everything the 1980s had to offer and now I'm like a rabid dog frothing at the mouth with glee anytime I see a shellsuit or hear a synth or a vocoder. Step in 2000F & J Kamata to prove my point: You Don't Know What Love Is.

Sun, drinks, music and a bank holiday weekend. These days are why we bother.

Sunday, 19 April 2009

Heavenly Communications

If he wants to split-up, he should call me, not the other way round.

Saturday, 28 March 2009

'If you can imagine the business as a pie...'

The Office is the best TV series ever - we all know that. Amongst much good work, it pays homage to one of my favourite lexical categories - business speak. Like most annoying human habits, business speak seems borne of insecurity; in this case, suppressed frustration and feelings of inadequacy. Business speak is confusing and unnecessary. It masquerades as something which actively clarifies an idea, when in fact it does the very opposite. It is the antithesis of brevity, concision and clarity. At its very worst, it's used to artificially elevate the user above others and needlessly belittle those who, quite understandably, find it almost undecipherable. Make no mistake; those using it are the ones to be mocked, not those of us who manage just as well with normal English in the office as we do out of it. But now to the point of this post - classic examples...

  • Synergy - e.g. 'I was tasked to create synergy within the company'. Were you? You're an arse.
  • .............-wise - e.g. 'I was dressed too casually so the boss asked me how I was fixed suit-wise.'
  • Eyeballing - e.g. 'Have you had that eyeballed?' 'Who's doing eyeballing today?' 'Let me eyeball that first.' Christ almighty, what's wrong with checking it?
  • Functionality - e.g. 'My workstation has no functionality.' No, there's a problem with your computer.
  • Workstation - e.g. see above. I'd let them have it if they were referring to the desk they sit at but they're not, they're using it as a substitute for the word 'computer'.
  • Visibility - e.g. 'I've got no visibility on that.' You mean you can't see it, or you can't access it.
  • Close of play - e.g. 'I'll have that over to you by close of play today.' If you're in a grotesquely boring office, where people say that sort of thing out loud, without a hint of irony, you won't be able to adequately express how unsuitable using 'play' as a metaphor for 'work' really is.
  • Blue sky thinking - e.g. 'I need some blue sky thinking on how to express my desire to have some original ideas on a given subject.'
  • Communicate - e.g. 'If I want you to go ahead, I'll communicate that to you.' What you'll do, is 'tell' me.
  • Pre-plan - e.g. 'Can we pre-plan for that?' No, you can't. You can plan for it, or not.
  • Action. (v) - e.g. 'I'm going to action that.' 'I'm actioning that as we speak.' ' Has that been actioned?' There are so many wonderfully descriptive verbs in the English language that using 'action' for all of them is more than a shame.
  • Let's run it up the flag pole and see who salutesAward for the most outlandish business related phrase I've ever heard. Breathtaking.
  • Strategic incompetenceA phrase used to describe the act of doing something deliberately badly in order to avoid doing it again in the future, e.g. making someone an unsatisfactory cup of tea in order to avoid future tea-making duties. This is the only phrase I've ever heard that I like, mainly because it was created in jest.

Thursday, 26 March 2009

NEWS JUST IN

HOLD THE PHONE: Archbishop of Canterbury says God won't sort climate change out for us. He's really gone out on a limb with this one - egg all over his face if God turns up!

Assuming he won't (like the best Dads he has a history of absenteeism) we've all got to face the fact that we've just lost plan A on this issue; it's back to the bloody drawing board for tackling climate change... God - he's such an enigma! Just when we were all relying on him to sort this one out. If I'd told the Christians that God wasn't going to help with this, or for that matter, anything else, they'd have questioned it. There's just no reasoning with some people, there really isn't.

Monday, 23 March 2009

Solitude with trimmings

I just realised that I haven't had a single conversation today; I'm a fresh, exciting new face in the office and my new colleagues just cannot get enough - Mission Ingratiate is complete.

I think today's unusual circumstance subconsciously influenced my choice of listening this evening. It wasn't a full-fat Morrissey evening interrupted only by unexplainable and uncontrollable outbursts of sobbing, but Jeff got a full airing.

Monday, 16 March 2009

Hubble Ultra Deep Field


When the Hubble telescope captured the matter in the above image, it was in fact looking back approximately 13 billion years. Clicking on the photo will take you to a high resolution version that conveys at least some of the beauty of the 10,000 galaxies in the photograph. I hadn't seen this until very recently and it upsets me to think I might never have come across it. I hope you enjoy it as much as I do every time I look at it.

More details can be found on the Wikipedia page for Hubble Ultra Deep Field.

Wednesday, 11 March 2009

Skip ITV


Inside the Guardian’s Media section on March 2, Steve Hewlett wrote much more knowledgably on ITV’s current woes than I ever could.

In short (because you’re likely to be of the generation that can barely concentrate long enough to read a house number i.e. mine) the recession does not bode well for old ITV as nobody has any money to advertise with them. Restructuring the main terrestrial channels that are not funded by license fee money is now important, as their revenues look set to shrink in coming years.

One thing about commerce pre-recession is that, unluckily for their employees, many businesses were only staying afloat because lenders could afford not to call in their debts. Failing businesses with no tangible identity or discernable strategies to create or increase business chugged along while they still could. How bereft do you feel as a consumer now that Woolworths and Zavvi have disappeared? ‘Not very’ I imagine. In the case of these businesses, you can’t help but feel that the recession didn’t cause their deaths but merely hasten them. While feeling sympathy for the unfortunate people who lost their jobs as a result, it should also be recognised that the recession is having this ‘straightening’ effect on business as it separates the wheat from the chaff. Coasting along on credit while ignoring the failings of your business is no longer an option.

This ‘survival of the fittest’ now seems to be applicable to ITV. Undoubtedly the channel is suffering due to a factor beyond their control, but it also seems about time ITV looked at the actual content they offer and see that it is also part of their problem. I read their schedule with more rampant depression than a dyslexic engineering undergraduate going through a reading list for a module on Chomskyan linguistics received in error. It is a veritable goldmine for the collector of poorly executed copies of BBC programmes. It is heaven for those yearning for embarrassing gaffes that interrupt sporting events at their climax and a primordial soup from whence all stuttering, wooden, sports presenters originated. Their few popular programmes are those that satisfy the lust of the morbidly curious voyeur, someone who thrives on others’ humiliation, is immersed in society’s love of judgment and celebrity, and lacks the imagination to do anything other than sit in front of a TV screen while other people make fools of themselves. When was the last time you watched anything on ITV and was it actually any good?

The BBC do great nature programmes and have commissioned some of the best comedies. Channel 4 import some good US TV and make entertaining documentaries. By comparison, ITV stands for nothing apart from lowest common denominator trash, and it would be neither surprising nor distressing if it ended up in the same mass grave as Woolworths, Zavvi and the rest, which it may do unless those at head office give some serious thought to improving the product they are currently offering the consumer.

Thursday, 5 March 2009

Miraculous Mash-up

Take two average pop songs, put them together and what do you have? In most cases, something that manages to be even more woeful than the original ingredients.

However, here we have something miraculous - a mash-up that works! Take quirky, delicious pop morsel Katy Perry, combine with a re-hash of a 2000 vintage, cheddar-laden dance anthem and you have Hot 'n' Cold vs Toca's Miracle 2008. The opening few lines ("You... change your mind... like a girl... changes clothes.") punctuated by the first few twanging notes of Toca's Miracle bring out my game face, a strangely tortured gurning usually reserved for Timbaland bangers and tunes of a similar ilk. For those of you not impressed by Insomnia-esque build-ups, skip to the 3 minute mark to get straight to the moment in question.

'Guilty pleasures' is becoming a recurring theme... 

Wednesday, 25 February 2009

Very superstitious.

One of my guiltiest pleasures is frequently watching Deal or No Deal during my days of exile from paid employment. Yesterday was interesting as it featured a particular type of contestant that comes along every now and then, much to my incredulity and amusement.

The notion, dear reader, that you may be unaware of the basic premise of Deal or No Deal is but a utopian ideal, so I shan't waste space boring you with the way the game works but you can familiarise yourself with the format on the Wikipedia entry if you've had successful therapy to forget.

Back to yesterday's game and we were faced with a rather rotund woman, who appeared huggable in that comforting way your grandma is or was. A baker, Huggable Kath seemed nice enough and I was willing to set aside my perverse lust for failure (which might do as a subject for psychological analysis in its own right) in what I considered a kind gesture of goodwill. Those welcoming, warm metaphorical arms of mine were soon to be rapidly retired.

As Noel, Cuddly Kath and the gang steadily made progress through the opening couple of rounds, something akin to light drizzle dripping off guttering as a viewing spectacle, all seemed relatively dandy. Sure, she'd taken out more of the reds than the blues prompting Noel to begin dipping into the jargon collection for some of the classic DOND terms and phrases ("YOU JUST LOVE YOUR REDS" in irked tone of voice) but nothing too serious; the Banker was offering relatively good money and by the third offer was up to £13,500.

It was at this point that Fat Kath began to complain of feeling 'unsettled' by the surprise of being chosen as the day's contestant. Noel, earning his crust, began his serious and earnest probing as to exactly what she meant by 'unsettled'. This is a man who, almost without fail, describes each day's game as 'extraordinary' 'exceptional' or, more realistically, 'different' (it is a different contestant each day, after all) and he thrives on players who have 'methods' , ‘attitudes' , 'intuitions' or 'approaches' in relation to the process of opening 22 boxes that have been randomly assigned a monetary value.

All-of-a-fluster Kath did not disappoint him, revealing that she now 'felt out of balance'. "Out of balance... what do you mean by that Kath? Spiritually?" asks Noel. Yes, spiritually, agrees Magic Kath, who then promptly reveals her belief in angels which is enough for Noel to solemnly declare "You are an intensely spiritual person Kath, aren't you." (it should be noted that there's not even a hint of a questioning intonation to this statement.) You might be inclined to ask how Noel deduced such a thing, having only met this woman 20-30 minutes ago whilst recording a TV gameshow. But he just can. It’s amazing watching him work.

After this brief exchange, my hackles are up - I feel like a fisherman who's been sitting languidly by the riverbed, throwing cursory glances at the water, only to suddenly hear the distinct taughtening of the line as my one hope comes to fruition. I'm more interested now.

A commercial break and we come back to find Noel's calmed Confused Kath down a little. She continues to the next offer, still with three of the biggest amounts, £35,000, £100,000 and £250,000 yet to be revealed. The banker offers £18,000.

Contestants plead with Disconcerted Kath to 'believe in herself', as does her daughter. For those of you not in the know, an impassioned speech begging the contestant to ‘believe in themselves’ is the semantic equivalent of 'please gamble' in Deal or No Deal. Big Kath is evidently a proud woman and, slightly indignantly, assures everyone in the room that she does believe in herself. In fact, she believes in herself to the extent that she will heed her ‘spiritual vibes’ despite them contradicting general feeling in the studio. Her ‘spiritual side’ is telling her it's not to be her day. She spends several moments deliberating, and re-iterating that she feels it’s not to be her day; a ‘spiritual intuition’ she's harboured since the offer of £13,500. "Are you in direct contact with them?" Noel half mumbles. "No," says Wise Kath, "I leave that to my daughter," (cut to shot of 30-something daughter in the audience nodding sagely) "but I trust what I'm feeling spiritually." Quite whom Noel's 'them' refers to is never made explicit; the angels? The spirits?… the psychiatric nurses? It’s funny how one set of people hearing voices in their heads have schizophrenia and another set of people hearing voices in their heads are ‘intensely spiritual’. Resigned Kath deals at £18,000, 'knowing' that it's all going to go pear-shaped.

The rest of the game must now be played out to see whether the decision to deal was one that won the contestant, Our Kath, the most amount of money possible. She goes on to eliminate more of the lower amounts of money and the next offer from the banker would have been £56,000. It's Noel to the rescue of Kicking-herself Kath's integrity at this point; "Well your feelings were right - it's not to be your day – not because there was no money in your game but because you were to deal too early." Flabbergasted Kath: "I must have got my wires crossed." That's one thing about those bloody spirits – they still insist on using those archaic, early 20th century telephone switchboards to communicate mentally with clairvoyants like Mystic Kath.

They open the next three boxes so that Ridiculous Kath is left with two boxes, one contains £100 and the other contains £250,000. The banker would have offered £81,000. Embarrassed Kath: "the signals and everything just got so foggy". Isn't it ghosts that are supposed to be a bit foggy? Have they been piggybacking on a conversation that was meant to involve strictly Cauliflower-cortex Kath and the spirits only? It looks like it because, according to Psychic Kath, things have got foggy, and that can only mean one thing; ghosts are getting in the way of her conversation with the spirits. Those bloody ghosts… that bloody conversation with the spirits.

For me of course, this show is already a victory for reason; a contestant confidently spouting complete twaddle, twaddle that not only goes unchecked but is actively encouraged by our indulgent host, has already proven she could have had £63,000 more than she accepted simply by being more rational. But now my jaw drops; Relentless Kath has just smugly asserted that there’s a blue in her box (the £100) as though her correctly guessing a 50/50 chance will suddenly elevate her back to the loftiness of ‘spiritual’ superior. In a matter of moments, Silly Kath and everyone else in the studio would happily forget that she couldn’t really have got it more wrong in the entirety of the programme up to this point, if it turns out she’s got the £100 in her box. If she knew, why didn’t she tell us at the start? A 1 in 22 guess that turns out to be correct is at least more impressive than an accurate 1 in 2 guess. I can’t help but yearn for there to be £250,000 in the box. If there’s not, Hokum Kath will nod wisely and the audience will gasp in rapt admiration; “wow, she was right all along, she did only have £100. It really wasn’t to be her day”. Noel opens her box… there’s £250,000 inside.

Thursday, 29 January 2009

John Martyn 1948-2009


What a sad day. John Martyn, a man responsible for some of the most moving, emotional and powerful music ever, died today aged 60.

Whatever your plans are this evening, find some time to raise a glass of red and enjoy some of his amazing work.

Sweet Little Mystery - "Now don't fall over!"

RIP John, and thanks.

Sunday, 18 January 2009

Another Sunday hangover

So I listened to this for some of the day - Reckoner.

Friday, 9 January 2009

An old gentleman

I'm going to continue with the gym theme for one more post if I may (and I may), by commenting on the unusually high number of 'seniors' that frequent Balham Leisure Centre. It's pertinent to mention it now because of the surreal experience I had this morning.

In the midst of one of my epic and, frankly, futile sessions of endeavouring to increase my weight from a paltry 6 stone to a gargantuan, Adonis-like 6 stone one pound, I noticed a sweet old chinese fella, in his sixties if not seventies, ambling over to one of the leg press machines. He walked with a slight hunch, big baggy clothes on and one of those baseball caps that's so small and pastel that it gets called a sunhat. It was more ornament than item of clothing, perched on his head the way it was; strictly speaking he wasn't actually wearing it.

After assimilating my thoughts and feelings on the hat, I noticed the slogan on his sweatshirt. At a glance I thought it said something along the lines of Zero to Hero. 'How lovely', I thought, 'probably a gift from a consortium of grandchildren who all chipped in to buy this much-loved relative a long-lasting reminder of their affection.' It was only when I re-read the text properly that I realised the sentiments being offered by this decrepit man, diligently making his way through 1 set of 3 reps in a foolhardy attempt to fend off his impending death, for the slogan actually read:

 Zero to Horny in 25 Beers.

Disturbing.